Religiosity try found to be the strongest predictor out of sexual prejudice inside our analyses

Lượt xem:

Đọc bài viết

Religiosity try found to be the strongest predictor out of sexual prejudice inside our analyses

Hence, i minimal the analyses so you’re able to participants’ thinking on the gay people, rather than certain emotions comparisons between homosexual men

Very Puerto Ricans go after specific translation of the Christian traditions. Given Christianity’s stance to your homosexuality since the a wicked lifetime, it is not shocking to get an effective negative relationship between religiosity and you will sexual bias (Diaz, 1998; Company, 1995). More over, i expected if or not religiosity you may improve intimate bias by the increasing participants’ moral resistance to activate that have gay someone and you will/otherwise perceive any connections having gay someone because the self-confident. However, a structural design that have religiosity forecasting intimate bias together with the other investigation parameters try seen to be unreliable and volatile. Therefore, we really do not believe religiosity is the driving grounds for everybody almost every other data details. When you’re an intervention to cut back individuals’ religiosity was unethical, i carry out suggest unlock discussions out of Christianity’s posture toward sexual positioning in place of homosexual habits contained in this spiritual setup (Wager, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). This type of things could possibly get remove Puerto Rican’s negative perceptions on the homosexual men and women by eliminating the main focus away from stigma regarding the gay personal so you’re able to a specific sexual choices.

In the long run, we receive no gender variations in the connections anywhere between intimate prejudice together with data variables. Nonetheless, its lack of intercourse distinction could be due to the dimension from intimate prejudice. The difference inside product posts inside our ATL and ATG subscales create specific comparisons between them subscales unfeasible. Past education looking for sex variations in attitudes with the homosexuality adjusted brand new ATLG product text are similar apart from the new reference classification (we.age., “[Male/Female] homosexuality was good perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Alternatively, probably the differences in intimate prejudice in regards to our research people is maybe not due to an intercourse dichotomy however, so you can differences all over sex jobs (Sakalli, 2002). Men having higher salience within the machismo and also in its thinking of maleness is provide higher intimate bias certainly one of guys (Cunningham, 1998). Upcoming look is discuss how goods text, cultural viewpoints, and you can gender differences ong Puerto Ricans.

However, reviews ranging from the model and the approach model suggest that religiosity, confident skills having gay someone, and you will amount of connections having gay boys and you will lesbian forecast intimate bias a lot better than the new alternate causal route

The studies has numerous constraints. Basic, brand new study’s cross-sectional studies limited the company temporal buying your parameters. Upcoming browse will be talk about the newest causal relationship between your study details. Second, financial and you will money limitations diminished our power to gather more substantial sample. A much bigger shot which are often split up within the random halves may allow for more variations is produced on one half of the new try, when you are comparison the totally-altered design about most other arbitrary half. 3rd, analysis findings can be low-generalizable getting Puerto Rican low-college communities. Although users searched motivated to participate in the study, early in the day lookup discover those with lowest educational attainment usually rating large to the intimate prejudice (Herek, 2002). Last, i failed to decide in the event that members interacted having homosexual males or lesbians exactly who worry about-unveiled their sexual direction or if perhaps it presumed males and you may lady was homosexuals. Fifth, all of our failure to evaluate how many youngsters absent within datingmentor.org/african-dating/ this each class room in survey limits the investigations out of possible visibility biases. However, once the investigation collection took place at the beginning of brand new semester, we think the chances of dropouts and you may pupils maybe not browsing lecture might have diminished. Finally, religiosity’s impact on sexual bias deserves better mining. Our research is unable to collect information about participants’ spiritual associations. Considering the diversity out-of Christian living (85% Roman Catholic and you can 15% Protestant or other; CIA Business Factbook (2005)), upcoming studies would be to speak about if or not religiosity’s influence on intimate prejudice varies of the spiritual living.